Priest sues Grindr for $5 million over data privacy breach
Jeffrey Burrill, a priest from Wisconsin, is suing the Grindr app for selling his data without consent. The revelation of his use of the dating app cost him his job and damaged his reputation. Burrill is seeking $5 million in damages.
31 July 2024 15:13
The priest from Wisconsin, Jeffrey Burrill, who lost his job after the revelation of using the Grindr dating app, has decided to sue the app. Burrill claims that the data was sold without his knowledge and consent, leading to the disclosure of private information.
Jeffrey Burrill, who served as the chief administrator of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) until 2021, accuses Grindr of not informing users about selling their data to third-party providers. This practice allowed people outside the app to discover his usage.
The disclosure of Burrill's data caused "significant harm" to his reputation, which is particularly painful, considering his vow of celibacy and the Catholic Church's stance on homosexual relationships.
In 2021, the former priest was forced to resign from his position in the Church after the Christian website "The Pillar" published an article that revealed he visited gay bars and used Grindr. The article was based on data obtained from the app.
In the lawsuit, Burrill claims that this data was provided to "The Pillar" by Catholic Laity and Clergy for Renewal (CLCR), which bought data from dating apps to track clerics breaking their vows. Burrill suggests that Grindr sold this data to the organization.
The former priest emphasized that he would never have joined the app if he had known his data would be available to others.
Former priest demands $5 million in damages
Burrill, who is still "trying to get back on his feet" after the "shame and embarrassment" associated with the disclosure of his orientation, has demanded $5 million in damages from Grindr. The company refused to pay, so Burrill filed a lawsuit, seeking compensation and the implementation of a policy preventing user data from being shared without their knowledge.
Grindr announced that it will respond to these allegations, which are based on a "misrepresentation of user data practices." The company previously denied that it shared user data publicly.
The CLCR organization admitted that it had, in the past, obtained data from Grindr to expose clergy members, but claimed it did not pass any data to "The Pillar". The disclosure of Burrill sparked broad criticism, with many people condemning the website's actions as dangerously homophobic.