NewsFederal judge blocks Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship

Federal judge blocks Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship

The executive order by President Donald Trump abolishing birthright citizenship is "blatantly unconstitutional," ruled a federal court, issuing a temporary ban on its implementation.

epaselect epa11847827 US President Donald J. Trump is shown on a screen as he addresses via remote connection a plenary session in the Congress Hall during the 55th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, 23 January 2025. The World Economic Forum annual meeting brings together entrepreneurs, scientists, corporate and political leaders in Davos and takes place from January 20 to 24. EPA/MICHAEL BUHOLZER Dostawca: PAP/EPA.
epaselect epa11847827 US President Donald J. Trump is shown on a screen as he addresses via remote connection a plenary session in the Congress Hall during the 55th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, 23 January 2025. The World Economic Forum annual meeting brings together entrepreneurs, scientists, corporate and political leaders in Davos and takes place from January 20 to 24. EPA/MICHAEL BUHOLZER Dostawca: PAP/EPA.
Images source: © PAP | PAP/EPA/MICHAEL BUHOLZER
Mateusz Czmiel

The executive order by President Trump aims to limit the automatic granting of citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. The order was signed by Trump on Monday—right after the inauguration—and was an attempt to change U.S. immigration laws and reverse longstanding precedents.

Judge John Coughenour, residing in Seattle, granted the request of Washington State Attorney General Nick Brown and three other states led by Democrats for an urgent injunction to halt the implementation of this policy for 14 days.

This decision is intended to allow further legal proceedings.

"I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear," said Judge Coughenour.

The judge asked, "Where were the lawyers" when the decision to sign this executive order was made. He added that it "boggled" him that a member of the bar could claim this order is constitutional.

© Daily Wrap
·

Downloading, reproduction, storage, or any other use of content available on this website—regardless of its nature and form of expression (in particular, but not limited to verbal, verbal-musical, musical, audiovisual, audio, textual, graphic, and the data and information contained therein, databases and the data contained therein) and its form (e.g., literary, journalistic, scientific, cartographic, computer programs, visual arts, photographic)—requires prior and explicit consent from Wirtualna Polska Media Spółka Akcyjna, headquartered in Warsaw, the owner of this website, regardless of the method of exploration and the technique used (manual or automated, including the use of machine learning or artificial intelligence programs). The above restriction does not apply solely to facilitate their search by internet search engines and uses within contractual relations or permitted use as specified by applicable law.Detailed information regarding this notice can be found  here.