Biden administration moves to arm Ukraine with JASSM missiles
According to Reuters, the Biden administration is close to approving the decision to supply Ukraine with JASSM missiles. This weapon's use on the frontline could significantly impact the course of the conflict. We explain which other equipment had similarly significant implications for the war's outcome.
Reuters reported on the planned supply of AGM-158 JASSM missiles to Ukraine, citing unofficial sources in the U.S. administration. Although the decision has not yet been formally approved, President Biden wants to deliver the missiles to Ukraine.
According to Reuters' sources, the process of transferring the new weapons could take several months, during which the administration needs to resolve "technical problems" related to the delivery. The missiles would be used in conjunction with the F-16 aircraft already supplied to Ukraine.
AGM-158 JASSM is a modern cruise missile with a range of approximately 300 kilometres for the basic version and over 1,000 kilometres for the JASSM-ER variant. The weapon's important advantage is its stealth characteristics, which make it difficult to detect and combat. In the basic version, its significant advantage is the warhead weight—with the total missile weight exceeding 1,000 kilograms, the warhead weighs as much as 450 kilograms.
The warhead weight is smaller in the JASSM-ER variant, which has a range of over 1,000 kilometres. To increase the range while maintaining the missile's dimensions and weight, the combat load was reduced in favour of additional fuel.
After supplying JASSM missiles to Ukraine, Kyiv will gain new capabilities to attack targets on the Russian rear. However, this weapon's actual significance depends on politics and the restrictions imposed on Kyiv regarding the freedom to use long-range Western weapons.
Guided artillery shells
One of the key weapons in the early days of the conflict turned out to be guided artillery shells. At the beginning of the war, Ukraine had a stockpile of Kvintyk shells developed and produced by its own industry. Laser-guided 152 mm shells were used in the first critical days of the war, among other things, to repel Russian forces moving toward Kyiv.
After exhausting its own guided artillery ammunition, Ukraine began using captured Russian 30F39 Krasnopol shells. Ukrainian armed forces also received guided artillery shells of Western production – M982 Excalibur.
Excaliburs – fired from Polish Krab self-propelled howitzers – made a very successful debut. Initially, their accuracy was estimated at an impressive 70 per cent, and single shells successfully destroyed, among other things, Russian tanks at a range of dozens of kilometres.
However, due to Russian countermeasures, the effectiveness of this weapon quickly began to decrease. GPS signal jamming caused the accuracy of Excalibur shells to drop to about 6 percent within just a few weeks.
This is particularly severe for a guided shell because the combat load it carries is smaller than that of unguided shells due to the necessity of incorporating guidance and control systems into the shell. Even a small miss-distance increase significantly reduces the chances of destroying the target in such cases.
M142 HIMARS – The nemesis of the Russian rear
The M142 HIMARS launchers were also very significant. The appearance of this weapon on the frontline, along with GMLRS missiles with a range of up to 80 kilometres, temporarily paralyzed Russian logistics. Shelling of frontline warehouses forced the Russians to move them to a deeper rear, significantly affecting the capabilities of the units fighting against Ukraine.
Over time, the effectiveness of HIMARS—though it remains a formidable weapon—began to decrease. This is due to the fact that Russians are effectively and on a large scale using electronic warfare, one manifestation of which is the jamming of GPS satellite signals.
Without satellite navigation, the missile is still guided—it uses dead reckoning navigation (inertial navigation). Based on data about its own speed, flight direction, and many other factors, the guidance system is able to approximately determine the position relative to a known coordinate target. However, this method is less accurate, which significantly reduces the effectiveness of shelling using GMLRS missiles.
Naval drones – David vs. Goliath
The naval part of Ukraine's war will go down in military history: a state without a navy managed to resist and then force the retreat of the Russian Black Sea Fleet.
In the early period of the war, the Russian Black Sea Fleet – despite suffering losses – successfully carried out its task, conducting a naval blockade of Ukraine; over time, this situation changed.
Ukraine virtually does not have a navy – even the corvettes ordered from Turkey – for security reasons – sailed under the Turkish flag during sea trials. Despite this, it managed to threaten the Black Sea Fleet thanks to naval drones.
Naval drone attacks, combined with the use of Storm Shadow missiles and SCALP-EG, made Sevastopol and Crimea no longer safe places for Russian ships. To protect their units, Russia was forced to withdraw most of them to ports on the eastern shore of the Black Sea.
